-
@Sheldrake @hackylawyER @mydataorg @me2balliance @TrusteeHIE @ntnsndr I've read this piece by Schneider before, and I love it. "The evidence of literature across several fields suggests that pro-cesses of decentralization in one part of a system seem to enable central-ization in another" is pretty much exactly what I said about D.I. in 2020! /1Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 2 Favorites Mood +4 🙂
-
@Sheldrake @hackylawyER @mydataorg @me2balliance @TrusteeHIE @ntnsndr In the name of re-decentralizing, we tend to decentralize one part of the stack/business model/power structure and re-centralize another, and in the best of cases not with our eyes closed or naïvely waiving a decent. banner overhead. But I'll admit that happens too at times 😉/2Permalink On twitter.com
-
@Sheldrake @hackylawyER @mydataorg @me2balliance @TrusteeHIE @ntnsndr "The lack of clarity around the term is functional, in that itenables people of varying ideological persuasions to imagine themselves aspart of a common project." This is my least favorite part, and why I usually ask people to avoid the term unless they're being very concrete /3Permalink On twitter.com
-
@Sheldrake @hackylawyER @mydataorg @me2balliance @TrusteeHIE @ntnsndr In the current working draft of the decentralization guidance document from the DID WG, for example, there are over 100 separate kinds of decentralization criteria applied to DID:methods, and it's unclear how much editing and debate it will take to ever ratify the document🤣 /4On twitter.com